by Ernest Valea
Most Westerners are familiar with the Parable
of the Prodigal Son as it appears in Luke's Gospel, but probably few are
aware that it has a Buddhist parallel in one of the major writings of Mahayana
Buddhism. Although both parables seem to convey a similar message regarding
God's compassion for humans, a closer look will reveal fundamental differences
in their teaching and consequently between Christianity and Buddhism. Let me
quote both parables and then analyze them.
First, here is the text in the Gospel According to Luke:
There was a man who
had two sons. The younger one said to his father, "Father, give me my
share of the estate." So he divided his property between them. Not long
after that, the younger son got together all he had, set off for a distant
country and there squandered his wealth in wild living.
After he had spent everything, there was a severe famine in that whole country,
and he began to be in need. So he went and hired himself out to a citizen of
that country, who sent him to his fields to feed pigs. He longed to fill his
stomach with the pods that the pigs were eating, but no one gave him anything.
When he came to his senses, he said, "How many of my father's hired men
have food to spare, and here I am starving to death! I will set out and go back
to my father and say to him: Father, I have sinned against heaven and against
you. I am no longer worthy to be called your son; make me like one of your
hired men." So he got up and went to his father.
But while he was still
a long way off, his father saw him and was filled with compassion for him; he
ran to his son, threw his arms around him and kissed him. The son said to him,
"Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you. I am no longer
worthy to be called your son." But the father said to his servants,
"Quick! Bring the best robe and put it on him. Put a ring on his finger
and sandals on his feet. Bring the fattened calf and kill it. Let's have a
feast and celebrate. For this son of mine was dead and is alive again; he was
lost and is found." So they began to celebrate.
Meanwhile, the older son was in the field. When he came near the house, he
heard music and dancing. So he called one of the servants and asked him what
was going on. "Your brother has come," he replied, "and your
father has killed the fattened calf because he has him back safe and sound."
The older brother became angry and refused to go in. So his father went out and
pleaded with him. But he answered his father, "Look! All these years I've
been slaving for you and never disobeyed your orders. Yet you never gave me
even a young goat so I could celebrate with my friends. But when this son of
yours who has squandered your property with prostitutes comes home, you kill
the fattened calf for him!" "My son," the father said, "you
are always with me, and everything I have is yours. But we had to celebrate and
be glad, because this brother of yours was dead and is alive again; he was lost
and is found." (Luke 15:11-32)
The Buddhist parable is longer:
A young man left his
father and ran away. For long he dwelt in other countries, for ten, or twenty,
or fifty years. The older he grew, the more needy he became. Wandering in all
directions to seek clothing and food, he unexpectedly approached his native
country. The father had searched for his son all those years in vain and
meanwhile had settled in a certain city. His home became very rich; his goods
and treasures were fabulous.
At this time, the poor son, wandering through village after village and passing
through countries and cities, at last reached the city where his father had
settled. The father had always been thinking of his son, yet, although he had
been parted from him over fifty years, he had never spoken of the matter to
anyone. He only pondered over it within himself and cherished regret in his
heart, saying, "Old and worn out I am. Although I own much wealth - gold,
silver, and jewels, granaries and treasuries overflowing - I have no son. Some
day my end will come and my wealth will be scattered and lost, for I have no
heir. If I could only get back my son and commit my wealth to him, how
contented and happy would I be, with no further anxiety!"
Meanwhile the poor son, hired for wages here and there, unexpectedly arrived at
his father's house. Standing by the gate, he saw from a distance his father
seated on a lion-couch, his feet on a jeweled footstool, and with expensive
strings of pearls adorning his body, revered and surrounded by priests,
warriors, and citizens, attendants and young slaves waiting upon him right and
left. The poor son, seeing his father having such great power, was seized with
fear, regretting that he had come to this place. He reflected, "This must
be a king, or someone of royal rank, it is impossible for me to be hired here.
I had better go to some poor village in search of a job, where food and
clothing are easier to get. If I stay here long, I may suffer oppression."
Reflecting thus, he rushed away.
Meanwhile the rich elder on his lion-seat had recognized his son at first
glance, and with great joy in his heart reflected, "Now I have someone to
whom I may pass on my wealth. I have always been thinking of my son, with no
means of seeing him, but suddenly he himself has come and my longing is
satisfied. Though worn with years, I yearn for him."
Instantly he sent off his attendants to pursue the son quickly and fetch him
back. Immediately the messengers hasten forth to seize him. The poor son,
surprised and scared, loudly cried his complaint, "I have committed no
offense against you, why should I be arrested?" The messengers all the
more hastened to lay hold of him and brought him back. Following that, the poor
son, thought that although he was innocent he would be imprisoned, and that now
he would surely die. He became all the more terrified, fainted away and fell on
the ground. The father, seeing this from a distance, sent word to the
messengers, "I have no need for this man. Do not bring him by force.
Sprinkle cold water on his face to restore him to consciousness and do not
speak to him any further." Why? The father, knowing that his son's
disposition was inferior, knowing that his own lordly position had caused
distress to his son, yet convinced that he was his son, tactfully did not say
to others, "This is my son."
A messenger said to the son, "I set you free, go wherever you will."
The poor son was delighted, thus obtaining the unexpected release. He arose
from the ground and went to a poor village in search of food and clothing. Then
the elder, desiring to attract his son, set up a device. Secretly he sent two
men, sorrowful and poor in appearance, saying, "Go and visit that place
and gently say to the poor man, 'There is a place for you to work here. We will
hire you for scavenging, and we both also will work along with you.'" Then
the two messengers went in search of the poor son and, having found him,
presented him the above proposal. The poor son, having received his wages in
advance, joined them in removing a refuse heap.
His father, beholding the son, was struck with compassion for him. One day he
saw at a distance, through the window, his son's figure, haggard and drawn,
lean and sorrowful, filthy with dirt and dust. He took off his strings of
jewels, his soft attire, and put on a coarse, torn and dirty garment, smeared
his body with dust, took a basket in his right hand, and with an appearance
fear-inspiring said to the laborers, "Get on with your work, don't be
lazy." By such means he got near to his son, to whom he afterwards said,
"Ay, my man, you stay and work here, do not leave again. I will increase
your wages, give whatever you need, bowls, rice, wheat-flour, salt, vinegar,
and so on. Have no hesitation; besides there is an old servant whom you can get
if you need him. Be at ease in your mind; I am, as it were, your father; do not
be worried again. Why? I am old and advanced in years, but you are young and vigorous;
all the time you have been working, you have never been deceitful, lazy, angry
or grumbling. I have never seen you, like the other laborers, with such vices
as these. From this time forth you will be as my own begotten son."
The elder gave him a new name and called him a son. But the poor son, although
he rejoiced at this happening, still thought of himself as a humble hireling.
For this reason, for twenty years he continued to be employed in scavenging.
After this period, there grew mutual confidence between the father and the son.
He went in and out and at his ease, though his abode was still in a small hut.
Then the father became ill and, knowing that he would die soon, said to the
poor son, "Now I possess an abundance of gold, silver, and precious
things, and my granaries and treasuries are full to overflowing. I want you to
understand in detail the quantities of these things, and the amounts that
should be received and given. This is my wish, and you must agree to it. Why?
Because now we are of the same mind. Be increasingly careful so that there be
no waste." The poor son accepted his instruction and commands, and became
acquainted with all the goods. However, he still had no idea of expecting to
inherit anything, his abode was still the original place and he was still
unable to abandon his sense of inferiority.
After a short time had again passed, the father noticed that his son's ideas
had gradually been enlarged, his aspirations developed, and that he despised
his previous state of mind. Seeing that his own end was approaching, he
commanded his son to come, and gathered all his relatives, the kings, priests,
warriors, and citizens. When they were all assembled, he addressed them saying,
"Now, gentlemen, this is my son, begotten by me. It is over fifty years
since, from a certain city, he left me and ran away to endure loneliness and
misery. His former name was so-and-so and my name was so-and-so. At that time
in that city I sought him sorrowfully. Suddenly I met him in this place and
regained him. This is really my son and I am really his father. Now all the
wealth which I possess belongs entirely to my son, and all my previous
disbursements and receipts are known by this son." When the poor son heard
these words of his father, great was his joy at such unexpected news, and thus
he thought, "Without any mind for, or effort on my part, these treasures
now come to me."
World-honored One! The very rich elder is the Tathagata, and we are all as the
Buddha's sons. The Buddha has always declared that we are his sons. But because
of the three sufferings, in the midst of births-and-deaths we have borne all
kinds of torments, being deluded and ignorant and enjoying our attachment to
things of no value. Today the World-honored One has caused us to ponder over
and remove the dirt of all diverting discussions of inferior things. In these
we have hitherto been diligent to make progress and have got, as it were, a
day's pay for our effort to reach nirvana. Obtaining this, we greatly rejoiced
and were contented, saying to ourselves, "For our diligence and progress
in the Buddha-law what we have received is ample". The Buddha, knowing
that our minds delighted in inferior things, by his tactfulness taught
according to our capacity, but still we did not perceive that we are really
Buddha's sons. Therefore we say that though we had no mind to hope or expect
it, yet now the Great Treasure of the King of the Law has of itself come to us,
and such things that Buddha-sons should obtain, we have all obtained. (Saddharmapundarika
Sutra 4)
The parable in its context
In Luke, the
parable reveals the character of God in Christianity and his expectation that
all sinners may return to a father-son relationship with him. Jesus told this
parable to a large public consisting of both the 'religious experts' of the
day, the Pharisees, and the people most despised by them, the tax collectors,
prostitutes and other outcasts (Luke 15,1-2). The Pharisees considered
these 'sinners' to be outside the acceptable boundary of God's kingdom and
criticized Jesus for enjoying their company. In contrast to their contemptuous
attitude, he told the previous two parables in Luke 15 (The Lost
Sheep and The Lost Coin), in order to emphasize God's initiative in seeking
and saving such sinners. In response, the 'outcasts' acknowledged their sinful
life and came to Jesus for healing and forgiveness, while the Pharisees
considered themselves good enough according to God's standards (see the Parable
of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector in Luke 18:9-14). Thus the Parable
of the Prodigal Son reveals both God's love for those who were ready to
accept it (the prodigal son who returns to his father), and his rejection of
the Pharisees' self-centered righteousness (the older son in the parable).
Although the contrast between the two sons is an important point in the
parable, since the Buddhist parable speaks only of a prodigal son, the teaching
about the older son in Luke will be ignored in this comparison.
The Buddhist parable is part of the famous Saddharmapundarika Sutra
(also called the Lotus Sutra, composed at the end of the second century
AD), which revealed the new teaching of Mahayana Buddhism regarding the bodhisattva
beings. The discourse of the Buddha's disciples takes place in front of a very
large public, consisting of arhats, nuns, bodhisattvas, gods and
other beings. His teaching was addressed to those who have reached the arhat
stage of becoming and are supposed to advance further to becoming a bodhisattva
and ultimately a Buddha. As the son in the parable shouldn't have been
satisfied with his low social status, the Buddhist disciples should also aspire
to a higher position, that of becoming a Buddha themselves. It will eventually
be attained after a long process of learning and acquiring merits.
The characters
In the Gospel the
father represents God, the Ultimate Reality in Christianity, while the prodigal
son is the individual living in sin who finally repents and returns to a
personal relationship with God. In the Sutra the father is Buddha (or
more specifically, the Buddha nature - Dharmakaya), while the son is the
individual struggling to become an enlightened bodhisattva being.
The son's departure and miserable
condition
The prodigal son in Luke
declares that he has had enough of staying home in obedience to his father and
wants to be on his own. Not only does he want to leave home, but he even dares
to claim his inheritance, the fortune he is supposed to get at his father's
death. It would have been the equivalent of saying: "Father, I wish you
were dead, so that I could cash in my inheritance." Such a demand is
obviously outrageous, especially in the Middle Eastern context. However,
instead of rebuking or even forsaking his son, the father grants his request.
Soon after this, the son leaves for a distant country where he squanders his
entire fortune in wild living. This is a quite new and interesting experience
for him, but it brings him to bankruptcy. Now he must find a job to make a
living in that country, and the best offer he has is to feed someone's pigs. In
a Jewish context, pigs are considered unclean animals; therefore being hired to
feed them and even being hungry enough to long for their food illustrates the
worst possible situation one can reach.
The spiritual meaning of the prodigal son's leaving home is human rebellion
against God, the heavenly father. God does not oppose one's freedom of will in
choosing how to live. As the son in the parable claims his inheritance and then
squanders it, humans use all that God has granted them (wealth, health, time
and relationships) not for serving him in obedience, but for selfish interests.
This attitude is called sin, and brings humans to the lowest possible stage of
decadence. Although living a sinful life is at first very attractive and
pleasant, in the end it leads to destruction, not only spiritually, but also
physically, emotionally and socially.
Although the father in the parable gives a large amount of money to his son, he
is still rich after the son's departure. His only concern proves to be his
son's personal safety and his eventual return home. Wealth plays no role for
him. As the rich father in the parable doesn't become poor by his son's
departure, God does not lose anything by our decision to live in rebellion
against him. The only one who is losing everything is the sinful individual.
The prodigal son of the Buddhist Sutra leaves home without any fortune
from his father. His departure looks more like running away in secrecy. He also
becomes poorer but is still able to make a living. The father doesn't seem to
have been rich at the moment of his son's departure. He rather becomes rich
after this episode, in another city than the one in which he lived with his
son. Therefore the son has no wealthy origins to which to return. Even if he
had such a wealthy home, the father has left it, so there is no place for him
to return. Regarding the father's concern in this story, he seems more worried
about having an heir than about making his son happy again.
The meaning of the son's wandering in the Buddhist tale is that there is no
initial privileged position to lose in one's spiritual becoming. As the son
leaves his home poor and remains poor, humans have no other inheritance than
karma, which makes them wander from one rebirth to another, rarely attaining a
human state. The only truth that governs human existence is suffering, and
ignoring it brings about karma, which leads to an endless wandering in multiple
worlds, heavens and hells, with no original position to return to. The only
spiritual fulfillment is a permanent growth toward nirvana.
The way back home
The prodigal son of
the Gospel finally comes to his senses and acknowledges his dramatic condition.
Ashamed, he plans to return to his father, confess his sin and ask to be hired
as a servant. This position, no matter how humiliating it could be in front of
his brother and the other servants, would be a much better choice than staying
with the pigs.
The process of "coming to one's senses" is called repentance. It
involves acknowledging the bankruptcy of living in sin and making the decision
to leave it.
The Buddhist prodigal son makes no decision to return to his father. He has no
place to return to, so he wanders from town to town until he unexpectedly
arrives at his father's palace. The son doesn't even recognize his father,
whose situation has changed a lot since his departure. The father's wealth
inspires fear, causing the son to run away again in order to avoid more
trouble. But the father recognizes him and sends his attendants to seize him
and bring him to the palace against his will.
The son's wandering in the world can be interpreted as the effect of karma and
rebirth. They 'seize' the individual and bring him or her in circumstances one
cannot logically understand. Therefore we constantly experience suffering until
we accept that the only solution is nirvana. Although reaching the status of a bodhisattva
in Mahayana Buddhism (a being that helps other beings to attain liberation)
seems to confer a personal destiny in the afterlife, the ultimate stage of
becoming is that of realizing shunyata, the emptiness of all things,
including personal existence.
What happens back home?
In Luke's
parable, the father is waiting for his son to return home. He knew that the son
couldn't find true fulfillment away from home. Instead of punishing him for his
foolish behavior, the parable says that "while he was still a long way
off, his father saw him and was filled with compassion for him; he ran to his
son, threw his arms around him and kissed him" (v. 20). Instead of
humiliating the son for the shame he cast on him at departure, the father
humiliates himself by running to meet him. Such a behavior is degrading
according to Jewish standards. When the son has recited just half of his
prepared speech, acknowledging he was wrong, the father interrupts him and
commands the servants to bring him the best robe, to put a ring on his finger
and sandals on his feet, to slaughter the fattened calf and to prepare a feast
to celebrate his son's return. These symbols prove full forgiveness and
restoration of the son to his prior status. The robe is a sign of great
distinction, the ring the sign of authority, the sandals a luxury (only slaves
were barefooted) and the slaughter of the fattened calf the sign of a very
important celebration in the family. Instead of becoming a hired servant as he
hoped, the son is fully restored to the position he abandoned long before.
The Sutra presents in a whole different way the prodigal son's return
home. The father unexpectedly recognizes him standing at his gate and sends his
attendants to seize him and bring him to the palace. The son doesn't understand
the situation and is terrified. Initially he is treated like a stranger because
of his "inferior disposition." Any sudden restoration is out of the
question.
Understanding his son's ignorance, the father hires him as a scavenger.
Although filled with compassion, the father cannot reveal his identity until
the son earns back his place in the family. So he meets him in disguise and
encourages him to be honest in his work in order to be promoted. He promises to
increase his salary and provide for his basic needs. The process of restoration
is very slow. The son lives for 20 years in a small hut while he works as a
scavenger. He must first prove to have acquired high qualities before being
accepted back into the family.
The testing process would probably continue, but the father becomes ill,
feeling his death to be imminent. Even at this time the son is not yet accepted
into the family, but only promoted to a higher position, that of accountant
over all his father's riches. Without abandoning his sense of inferiority, the
son becomes acquainted with all the goods. Noticing that his son's perspective
has gradually improved and that he despises his former status, only then does
the father gather all his relatives and friends and declare the former servant
to be his son and heir.
The teaching of the parable in
Christianity and Buddhism
The Christian meaning
of the parable is clear: We all need to return to God in repentance and faith.
He does not compel us, so it must be a personal decision. God's forgiveness is
not gained through high spiritual achievements, such as attaining merits
through compassionate living or developing hoigh skills in meditation, but only
by repentance. The price for our reconciliation with God was paid by Jesus
Christ, through his death on the cross. There is nothing more to add.
The parable depicts God's amazing availability to forgive and restore us, his
great love that accepts us independently of our status and past. It encourages
us to come to him in repentance and faith, without fear, and so inherit
personal communion with him in his everlasting kingdom.
The Buddhist parable has a different message. One cannot simply reach
Buddhahood at once. The process is very long and demands a progressive
accumulation of wisdom. Escaping from ignorance and suffering, attaining
nirvana and becoming a bodhisattva is attained gradually by a day-by-day
effort in training the mind and overcoming karma. Grace, in Buddhism, cannot be
shown directly, but only as the disciple deserves it, which in fact is no grace
at all.
There is also a major difference from Christianity in defining the status of
the perfected being. Personhood has no room in nirvana. Although the bodhisattvas
act as personal beings, they act as temporary catalysts for the sake of other
beings so that they may also attain nirvana. The ultimate stage of spiritual
progress is that of realizing shunyata, the emptiness of all things. It is the
final blowing out of the candle, not the restoration of a broken relationship.
Eternal communion with the Father in his kingdom makes no sense in Buddhism
because ultimately there is no Father to have communion with.
The following table summarizes the contrasts in the teaching of the two
parables:
Topic in the parable |
Meaning in
Christianity |
Meaning in Buddhism |
The context |
Jesus is teaching
sinners, emphasizing their need and opportunity to be reconciled with God. |
Buddha is teaching
spiritually advanced disciples (arhats) about their need to attain a
higher position, that of a bodhisattva. |
The characters |
God and sinners |
The Buddha (as the
ultimate Buddha nature) and those challenged to attain a similar status |
The meaning of the
son's departure from home |
The human attitude
of rebellion against God, called sin |
Ignorance starts the
wheel of rebirth. |
The son's miserable condition |
The human condition
under the power of sin, away from personal communion with God |
Karma and rebirth
force one to wander from one physical existence to the next. |
The decision to
return home |
A personal decision
to leave sin, called repentance |
Karma and rebirth
eventually lead one to the proper level where wisdom and spiritual progress
can be attained. |
The father's
attitude at the son's arrival |
Complete forgiveness
of sin and restoration to personal fellowship with God |
The Buddha's
"grace" allows one to progress little by little toward Buddhahood.
One has to deserve his or her position by a process of gradual spiritual
development. |
Who pays the damage
for the lost fortune |
Jesus Christ paid
the price for our forgiveness through his death and resurrection. |
The disciple has to
pay himself the price for erasing his or her ignorance, and constantly
accumulate wisdom. |
The son's
inheritance |
Eternal communion
with God in his kingdom |
Attaining an
impersonal Ultimate Reality (shunyata), where there is no room for
personhood and communion |